Today I've been working on the chronology - offline updates. There is an alphabetical section and a media walk-in section. I am still in the letter A at the moment. The alphabetical section will include as many of those known in our group as possible, except for media walk-ins (fictives/soulbonds). The media walk-in section will obviously contain all the media walk-ins.
I have a small dilemma. There are some individuals who have history based in a media source, but they are not mentioned in the official canon. They are more along the lines of 'in-sourced'. For instance, someone is a Jedi and obviously based in a Star Wars canon, but they are not in any novel, comics or the movies. Should I place them in the regular alphabetical section? Or the media walk-in section?
I'm trying to prevent placing a duplicate in each. I'm leaning more towards only placing 'known' or 'recognizable' individuals in the media walk-in section. This isn't so much for our benefit, as for curious visitors to our site. Either way, I'm hoping to have a few new pages to upload soon.
I have a small dilemma. There are some individuals who have history based in a media source, but they are not mentioned in the official canon. They are more along the lines of 'in-sourced'. For instance, someone is a Jedi and obviously based in a Star Wars canon, but they are not in any novel, comics or the movies. Should I place them in the regular alphabetical section? Or the media walk-in section?
I'm trying to prevent placing a duplicate in each. I'm leaning more towards only placing 'known' or 'recognizable' individuals in the media walk-in section. This isn't so much for our benefit, as for curious visitors to our site. Either way, I'm hoping to have a few new pages to upload soon.